| BASIC GAME INFORMATION |
Release date: Oct 18 2022
Genre: Action Games, Adventure Games
developer: Asobo Studio
Publishing house: Focus Entertainment
A Plague Tale: Requiem is the second part of the famous action-adventure game, which introduced us to the dark world of the Middle Ages, mired in its own vices. Two ordinary people are still trying to survive in a place that has prepared a lot of deadly trials for brave heroes.
|
PC RECOMMENDED FOR GAME (60 FPS)
|
|||||||||||||||
If you decide to download A Plague Tale: Requiem via torrent for free in Russian, then you will again meet with Amicia, beloved by many, and her brother Hugo. Both children grew up quite quickly, because they had to flee their native Paris, engulfed in plague and the sacred flame kindled by fanatical inquisitors.
| THE GRAFICAL PART |
This subsection of our review highlights the main graphical aspects of this game. Particular attention is paid to the version of the graphics engine used, the version of the API used, graphic settings and the quality of development of the main visual aspects.
| SUPPORTED OS AND GRAPHICS API |
A Plague Tale: Requiem supported by Windows 10/11.
Priority and main graphics API for A Plague Tale: Requiem is DX12.
| GAME ENGINE |
Game A Plague Tale: Requiem is based on an internal game engine developed by Asobo Studio for games of its own production, regarding which there is practically no information on the network.
| SETTINGS |
A Plague Tale: Requiem has a sufficient range of graphic settings.
Below we have provided screenshots of the game at various graphics settings, where our readers can see the difference between the minimum and maximum graphics quality settings.
| QUALITY MODES |
| DLSS/FSR |
| TECHNOLOGIES |
A Plague Tale: Requiem, like its predecessor, has a fairly strong visual:
Well, then we will move directly to gaming tests and determine what impact this game has on modern computer hardware.
| TEST PART |
| Test configuration | |
| test stands |
MSI MPG Z490 GAMING CARBON WIFI |
| Multimedia equipment |
Water cooling system ROG RYUJIN II 360 Seasonic PRIME TX-1000 power supply 32 GB DDR4 4000 CL18 Comet Lake 32 GB DDR4 3600 CL16 Rocket Lake |
| Software configuration |
|
| Operating system | Windows 10 21H2/ Windows 11(Alder Lake) |
| Graphics driver |
Nvidia GeForce/ION Driver Release 522.25 WHQL AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 22.10.1 |
| Monitoring programs |
MSI Afterburner |
Our video cards were tested at different screen sizes of 1920×1080, 2560×1600 and 3840×2160 maximum graphics quality settings.
The motherboard was used to test the AM5 platform ROG CROSSHAIR X670E GENE and water cooling system ROG RYUJIN II 360.
Motherboard ROG CROSSHAIR X670E GENE , made in the mATX form factor, allows you to realize the capabilities of the ROG series in compact gaming systems. With a powerful power supply and cooling heatsinks, it can unleash the full potential of AMD Ryzen 7000 series processors. DIY enthusiasts will also appreciate support for modern components and standards, including PCIe 5.0, DDR5 memory, Wi-Fi 6E and USB4 interfaces.
Sistema zhidkostnogo okhlajdeniya ROG RYUJIN II 360 with 3,5″ LCD display, in-pump fan and three 120mm Noctua iPPC 2000 radiator fans and seventh generation Asetek pump.
| GPU TEST |
In the video card test, the default resolution is 1920×1080; other resolutions are added and removed manually. You can also remove and add any positions of video cards. You can also select any of our test processors from the list in the drop-down menu, comparing its performance with the given video card tests (by default, the most productive solution is selected). The test is carried out on the most powerful CPU in this game and is scaled to other processors, taking into account their testing on NVIDIA and AMD video cards.
If you are interested in purchasing video cards from our testing, you can follow the link in its title in the modular chart and select the required model.
- Very high
When resolved 1920×1080 average FPS of 25 frames showed level video cards Radeon RX Vega 56 or GeForce GTX 1070. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 56 or GeForce GTX 1070. A comfortable average FPS of 60 frames can be provided by solutions Radeon RX 6800 or GeForce RTX 3070..
When resolved 2560×1440 average FPS of 25 frames showed level video cards Radeon RX Vega 56 or GeForce GTX 1080. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX Vega 64 or GeForce RTX 2060s. A comfortable average FPS of 60 frames can be provided by solutions Radeon RX 6900 XT or GeForce RTX 3080.
When resolved 3840×2160 average FPS of 25 frames showed level video cards Radeon RX 6800 or GeForce RTX 3070. Minimum FPS of at least 25 frames can be provided by video cards of the level Radeon RX 6800 or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti.
| VIDEO MEMORY CONSUMPTION |
Testing of video memory consumed by the game was carried out by the program MSI Afterburner. The indicator was based on the results on video cards from AMD and NVIDIA with separate screen sizes 1920×1080, 2560×1440 and 3840×2160 with various anti-aliasing settings. By default, the graph displays the most current solutions. Other video cards are added and removed from the schedule at the request of the reader.
- Very high
GameGPU
When resolved 1920×1080 video memory consumption of video cards from 8 gigabytes to 4 gigabytes, with 12 gigabytes 4 gigabyte, with 16 gigabytes 4 gigabyte.
When resolved 2560×1440 video memory consumption of video cards from 8 gigabytes to 5 gigabytes, with 12 gigabytes 5 gigabyte, with 16 gigabytes 5 gigabyte.
When resolved 3840×2160 video memory consumption of video cards from 8 gigabytes to 6 gigabytes, with 12 gigabytes 6 gigabyte, with 16 gigabytes 6 gigabyte.
| CPU TEST |
Testing was carried out at a resolution of 1920×1080. In the processor test, you can remove or add any processor positions. You can also select any tested video card from the list in the drop-down menu, comparing its performance with the given processor test results (by default, the most productive solution from NVIDIA is selected). Testing takes place on the most powerful NVIDIA and AMD video cards and scales to low-end models.
If you are interested in purchasing the processor from our testing, you can follow the link in its name in the modular graphics and select the required model.
- Very high
When using video cards NVIDIA processors showed an acceptable indicator of at least 25 frames per second Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i 7 4770, and an FPS of at least 60 frames per second will be able to provide solutions at the level Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i 7 4770 .
When using video cards AMD acceptable figure is not less than 25 frames per second showed processors Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i 7 4770 , and FPS not lower than 60 frames per second will be able to provide level solutions Ryzen 5 1400 or Core i 7 4770 .
- Very high
GameGPU
The game can load up to 16 streams. The game uses 8 threads as efficiently as possible.
| RAM TEST |
The test was carried out on the basic configuration of Core i 9 12900K with 32 GB DDR5 5400 MHz pre-installed memory. All used RAM was taken as an indicator. The RAM test on the entire system was carried out on various video cards without launching third-party applications (browsers, etc.). In the graphics, you can add and remove any resolutions and video cards as desired.
- Very high
GameGPU
When resolved 1920×1080 RAM consumption for video cards from 8 gigabytes to 10 gigabytes , with 12 gigabytes 10 gigabyte , with 16 gigabytes 11 gigabyte.
When resolved 2560×1440 RAM consumption for video cards from 8 gigabytes to 10 gigabytes , with 12 gigabytes 10 gigabyte , with 16 gigabytes 11 gigabyte.
When resolved 3840×2160 RAM consumption for video cards from 8 gigabytes to 10 gigabytes , with 12 gigabytes 10 gigabyte , with 16 gigabytes 11 gigabyte.
This review presents the version A Plague Tale: Requiem for Microsoft Store, which has worse performance than the GOG version. Thanks to the vigilance of our users, we were able to identify that something was going wrong with our past testing…
You can read the review for GOG at the following link
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
| Тeating 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 78% |
Graphics 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 75% |
Optimization 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 36% |