BASED INFORMATION ON THE MATERIAL |
Well, upon completion of our testing, we present our debut material on identifying the fastest solutions of the past year. Below we have provided a list of 11 of our reviews, on the basis of which our conclusions were based:
ELDEN RING – PC performance graphics benchmarks of Graphics Cards and Processors 2022
God of War – PC performance graphics benchmarks of Graphics Cards and Processors 2022
Dying Light 2: Stay Human – PC performance graphics benchmarks of Graphics Cards and Processors 2022
F1 22 – PC performance graphics benchmarks of Graphics Cards and Processors 2022
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered – PC performance graphics benchmarks of Graphics Cards and Processors 2022
Gotham Knights – PC performance graphics benchmarks of Graphics Cards and Processors 2022
A Plague Tale: Requiem – PC performance graphics benchmarks of Graphics Cards and Processors 2022
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – PC performance graphics benchmarks of Graphics Cards and Processors 2022
UNCHARTED: Legacy of Thieves Collection – PC performance graphics benchmarks of Graphics Cards and Processors 2022
Marvel’s Spider-Man: Miles Morales – PC performance graphics benchmarks of Graphics Cards and Processors 2022
The Callisto Protocol – PC performance graphics benchmarks of Graphics Cards and Processors 2022
DETERMINING THE MOST PERFORMANCE SOLUTIONS AMONG VIDEO CARDS |
All our hardware was tested on the test configurations given below:
Test configuration | |
test stands |
GIGABYTE Z590 VISION |
Sponsorship video cards |
MSI GEFORCE RTX 4090 SUPRIM X 24 GB MSI GEFORCE RTX 4080 SUPRIM X 16 GB MSI GEFORCE RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 12 GB MSI GEFORCE RTX 3070 Ti GAMING TRIO 8 GB MSI GEFORCE RTX 3050 GAMING X 8 GB |
Multimedia equipment |
Seasonic PRIME TX-1000 power supply Kingston XS2000 Portable SSD 1 TB- optimal solution for testing different configurations 32 GB DDR4 3600 CL16 Kingston FURY Renegade 32 GB DDR4 4000 CL18 Kingston FURY Renegade 32 GB DDR5 5600 CL40 Kingston Fury Beast 32 GB DDR5 6000@6400 CL30 Kingston FURY Renegade |
Software configuration |
|
Operating system | Windows 10 21H2/ Windows 11(Alder Lake) |
Graphics driver |
Nvidia GeForce/ION Driver Release 527.62 WHQL AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 22.12.2 |
Monitoring programs |
MSI Afterburner |
Total performance
Next, we will begin processing the results of our test. So, to find out what the fastest solutions are video cards in games of 2021, we will sum up their total FPS in the tested games.
- Very high
For all types of screens MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM X was in first place, MSI GeForce RTX 4080 SUPRIM X was in second place, and ASUS Radeon RX 7900 XTX was in third place.
Relative performance
Each chart shows the tested MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM X graphics card as 100% performance and shows the % performance of any other video cards relative to it. The percentage indicator was displayed for each game separately, and then from all these indicators the average % was derived relative to all tested games.
The higher the resolution, the further the MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM X moves away from its companions in the form of the MSI GeForce RTX 4080 SUPRIM X ASUS Radeon RX 7900 XTX. And if at a resolution of 1920×1080 they lag behind by only 15%, then at 2560×1440 they lag behind by 22%, and at 4K the lag is already up to 27%.
DETERMINING THE MOST PERFORMANCE SOLUTIONS AMONG PROCESSORS |
Total performance
Next, we will begin processing the results of our test. So, to find out which are the fastest CPU solutions in games of 2021, we will also sum up their overall FPS in the tested games.
- Very high
When using video cards NVIDIA The top three looks like this: Core i9 13900K, AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, Core i9 12900K.
When using video cards AMD the same top three – Core i9 13900K, AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Core i9 12900K.
Relative performance
Each diagram shows the processor tested Core i9 13900K as an indicator of 100% performance and shows the % performance of any other processor relative to it. The percentage indicator was displayed for each game separately, and then from all these indicators the average % was derived relative to all tested games.
Each diagram shows the processor tested Core i9 13900K as an indicator of 100% performance and shows the % performance of any other processor relative to it.
DETERMINING THE MOST OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS AMONG VIDEO CARDS |
Video card prices
The price was taken based on proposals for the average minimum price of each solution, which can be found in stock in Hotline catalogs for the month of December, although their availability may be questionable.
Total FPS/$
And the next step is to identify the most optimal purchases, as a result of which we can buy the largest number of FPS for 1 $. We divide the total FPS by the cost of video cards and get the number of FPS that we can purchase for $1. To avoid decimal digits, all results were multiplied by 100 and thus we obtained the so-called ratio of video cards performance to its price.
1920×1080: for this resolution, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, AMD Radeon RX 6600, AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT are in the lead in terms of price per FPS.
2560×1440: for this resolution, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, AMD Radeon RX 6600, AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT are in the lead in terms of price per FPS.
3840×2160: For this resolution the price to FPS ratio is in the lead AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT,AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT.
DETERMINING THE MOST OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS AMONG PROCESSORS |
Processor prices
Now look at the cost of processors at the moment(the price was taken based on proposals for the average minimum price of each solution, which can be found in stock in the catalogs of some stores for the month of December, although their availability may be questionable.
Overall FPS/Price of processors 1920×1080
And the next step is to identify the most optimal purchases, as a result of which we can buy the largest number of FPS for 1 $. We divide the total FPS and get the number of frames that we can purchase for $1. To avoid decimal digits, all results were multiplied by 10 and thus we obtained the so-called performance-to-price ratio.
When using NVIDIA video cards, the price per FPS ratio is ahead Ryzen 5 3600, Ryzen 3 3100 iRyzen 3 3300.
When using NVIDIA video cards, the price per FPS ratio is ahead Ryzen 5 3600, Ryzen 3 3100 iRyzen 3 3300.
Results |
As we can see, the results speak for themselves, now let’s move directly to the results of the video cards provided to us for the annual review:
MSI GEFORCE RTX 4090 SUPRIM X 24 GB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 74% |
MSI GEFORCE RTX 4090 SUPRIM X 24 GB , review of this video cards on our website available at the following link.
This video card is currently one of the most productive graphics solutions. Received the highest performance rating 100% according to our test, but has a minimum coefficient for optimality FPS/$: for 1920×1080 it equals 69 , for 2560×1440 equals 64 and for 3840×2160 it is equal 41.
MSI GEFORCE RTX 4080 SUPRIM X 16 GB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 75% |
MSI GEFORCE RTX 4080 SUPRIM X 16 GB , review of this video cards on our website available at the following link.
This video card is currently the second most rated productive solution. Received a performance rating for 1920×1080 equal to 86% , for 2560×1440 it is equal to 79% and for 3840×2160 it is equal 76% according to our test.
Has the following optimality coefficients FPS/$: for 1920×1080 it equals 106 , for 2560×1440 equals 81 and for 3840×2160 it is equal 50.
ASUS Radeon RX 7900 XTX 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 66% |
ASUS Radeon RX 7900 XTX, review of this video cards on our website available at the following link.
This video card is currently the second most rated productive solution. Received a performance rating for 1920×1080 equal to 81% , for 2560×1440 it is equal to 77% and for 3840×2160 it is equal 73% according to our test.
Has the following optimality coefficients FPS/$: for 1920×1080 it equals 113 , for 2560×1440 equals 86 and for 3840×2160 it is equal 54.
ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7900 XT OC Edition 20GB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 86% |
ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7900 XT OC Edition 20GB, review of this video cards on our website available at the following link.
This video card is currently the second most rated productive solution. Received a performance rating for 1920×1080 equal to 71% , for 2560×1440 it is equal to 66% and for 3840×2160 it is equal 61% according to our test.
Has the following optimality coefficients FPS/$: for 1920×1080 it equals 113 , for 2560×1440 equals 86 and for 3840×2160 it is equal 53.
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 83% |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti OC, review of this video cards on our website available at the following link.
This video card is currently the second most rated productive solution. Received a performance rating for 1920×1080 equal to 70% , for 2560×1440 it is equal to 66% and for 3840×2160 it is equal 61% according to our test.
Has the following optimality coefficients FPS/$: for 1920×1080 it equals 125 , for 2560×1440 equals 98 and for 3840×2160 it is equal 58.
Well, we express our deep gratitude to our partners represented by the companies GIGABYTE, MSI, ASUS and KINGSTON, without whom carrying out this annual testing would have been simply impossible!
OUR SPONSORS |
|